FIXED ATTENTION, DUPLICATION, HOW TO AUDIT CHILDREN

And this morning we have - first thing, we had a couple of outside pcs yesterday - just demonstration type cases.

This afternoon we're going to take up something on the order of Acceptance Level Processing. I said I would take some of this up earlier and actually, one way or another, have been taking it up because it all comes down to "have" and "not-have" when we finish up with the integration.

Male voice: Well, Dick, he took a few minutes and after about three-quarters of an hour, why, Dick handled most of it. I started to wind it up, and then Dick starts going again, and he kept going for two hours.

If you have anchor points, you have space; but you're not likely to have much space unless you have some anchor points; but it is a scarcity of space; but it still comes into a havingness as far as space is concerned. And you get this entire problem interwound within itself.

Two hours, huh?

Actually, the instantaneous fact - if you can imagine an instantaneous fact - the instantaneous fact is space, anchor points, nothingness and somethingness combined. And that instantaneous fact, added to it the ingredient called theta, and you've got life and its performance.

Male voice: And he - he got remarkable results.

The ingredient called theta is seldom visible to the common public. The main reason it's not visible to the common public is they don't look. Now, it may or may not be true that theta is nothing and MEST is something. This was the theory which brought us into the techniques which we are now using. A theory is as good as it will take you, and the theta-MEST theory is still taking us places.

Mm-hm.

That theory is simply that - that theta is a static in terms of this universe, which means that it has no wavelength, no dimension, so forth.

Male voice: It the guy, he - the fellow can - is exteriorizing, and he increased his ability to communicate, and he just looked like a different guy when he walked out of here in two hours.

Oddly enough, after I'd defined this, I suddenly recalled the definitions for zero. And what do you know, mathematics had never defined zero and we had mathematicians dealing with a wild variable continually. Was it a past, present or future zero? Was it a zero of geographical location? Was it a zero - a zero of something? So if we had a zero of something we were postulating continually a mathematical absolute, and it was just about as usable as it has turned out to be true. In other words, the mathematical zero is not true. Therefore, you can expect theta, as a theoretical zero, to suddenly develop at any time - a somethingness.

Well, it would be astonishing to you to realize that guy was a neurotic - borderline psycho. And you were working real hot bait there and I never even bothered to tell you. He was real hot.

And the more you start unveiling a case, and the more you start picking up the lines and getting him back to look where he all of a sudden says quite happily, "Well, there's nothing there," if it's close to the end of a session, you just leave it at that. But if there's really nothing there, you'd keep mocking up "nothing there" and fooling with this thing and going around and walking around and looking at it and forgetting about it and coming back to it again and so forth.

Male voice: I never saw anybody could respond that quickly.

Because any time anybody traced a communication line which wound up in nothing, he has hit something which hasn't enough body for him to perceive at the moment you're processing him. You've simply exceeded his ability to shift wavelength, and that is all. And when you have exceeded his ability to shift wavelength, you have simply and plainly and flatly come up against a "No, I won't look." That's about all there is to processing is find the nothingnesses and get something there, take the somethingnesses and get nothing there and everything reduces back and next thing you know, why, you have things pretty well straightened out.

Well, I asked him if he could remember something real and a couple of minutes later we dropped the subject.

So you have an instantaneous fact in operation all through cases. And cases are prone to shift and change on you from session to session.

Male voice: Why, at the end of his session his communication was fairly good.

A great many sessions of very short duration is superior to a few sessions of very long duration. A pc has a tendency after a half an hour or an hour to fog up a little bit, one way or the other, in the hands of most auditors. Let's qualify it. If the auditor is on the ball, the pc never gets a chance to. The auditor conceives that there are nothingnesses around which ought to have somethingnesses in them and immediately begins to build back the missing items in the case. So we're up against the problem of restoration of havingness, aren't we?

He also stammered.

You might think that processing consists mainly of reducing everything to nothing. A V is doing that. But this is not true. Actually, processing consists of restoring havingness. We run somebody up to the other end, we say, "Take a look at your body now. Do you see a communication line? All right. Where does it go? Well, just run up on the line and see where it is. What do you got there? Well, that's very interesting. That's fine. Duplicate it, duplicate it, duplicate it, duplicate it, blow it up. All right. Now, duplicate it a couple more times and blow it up. Yank the line and throw it away. Okay. Got another line? All right, trace that up." Follow-follow-follow-follow...

Male voice: He what?

"Well, what do you know, there's nothing here! Uh-oh! Oh-oh!" You get the handling of lines? "Nothing there."

He also stammered.

"All right, put nothing there. Put nothing there."

Male voice: He didn't when he left.

There's a lot of ways to handle this, by the way, just tons of ways. The more surprising ways you think of to handle it, the faster your preclear will work, too, because he gets (quote) onto your tricks after a while (unquote) and realizes that you are (quote) forcing him to look (unquote). And he'll play along with you. And you may be processing somebody for several minutes before you suddenly realize that, gee, he's doing a royal dodge on you. He just isn't looking. And he's bouncing all around and skittering all around something and trying to find something that is sufficiently consequential to attract the auditor's attention - sufficiently consequential to attract the auditor's attention - and not sufficiently consequential to suddenly blow him into the middle of next week. See, it becomes a contest, then, of the auditor persuading the preclear to look and the preclear's contest persuading the auditor not to let him look. And this, downscale, is why cases have a rough time of it sometimes - the restoration of havingness. Therefore, Acceptance Level Processing should be something that you understand very, very well.

Male voice: No.

A lot of your people out in the field, now, they've heard of Acceptance Level Processing. They're going to get, pretty soon, three PABs - I think PAB 13, 14 and 15 are Acceptance Level Processing. PAB 12 is explosions. It doesn't give them all the dope on explosions but it'll make them happy for a while. It gives them all anybody would care to handle at the moment. But 13, 14 and 15 are devoted to the character and so forth of man and Acceptance Level Processing.

Well, that's very good. Thank you.

Now, you understand that Acceptance Level Processing is a tool to develop understanding, primarily, and secondarily, a tool for auditing. You get that? That's SOP 8-L. Acceptance Level Processing shifts in and Expanded GTTA goes out. SOP 8-L: What is the acceptance level of the pc? We determine this by the fact that he has vacuums sitting all around that will soak up one kind of item - there's a hunger. What you can say about the pc is that he's hungry. What you can say about any pc is that he's hungry. But you as an auditor have to find out "for what." He's hungry for the damnedest things.

You ran a flock of explosions on him and exteriorized him, had him patch up the body. Good, yeah. That was very good, Dick.

People come in, they look gaunt, they look starved, like that fellow you processed yesterday - real gaunt, see? Now, if you'd suddenly started to - now, that's why I say "secondarily processing," you understand - because if you'd started to satiate his hungers, yeoow! You'd have just been at it and at it and at it. Furthermore you would've jarred his bank up to such an extent that he wouldn't have exteriorized easily. See?

This chap just dropped in. He was into the correspondence and he'd written in a couple of times. I don't know where he's from or anything of the sort. But it seemed to me from his handwriting and his method of expressing himself that he might be an interesting case to see how fast you could drag him out of the ragbag and it was a good job of doing so.

But if he hadn't exteriorized right when he did, after you did what you did - a few explosions, you exteriorized him, and you went on and worked him; the case got a lot better That's the right way to go about it. But if he hadn't exteriorized and he hadn't exteriorized and he hadn't ex- he's hungry for something. He's so hungry for something that he just can't let go of what he's got, it's so scarce, it's so rare, it's so unhaveable. In other words, something has escaped his ability to have. And the second it's escaped his ability to have, he'd hold on to any shadow of it. And a mock-up on an inverted dynamic is a shadow of something he can't have. And a missing mock-up is something that just doesn't exist, it's so rare. See?

But, how long do you suppose it would have taken to achieve the same results under Dianetics? Interesting, isn't it? When you see something like that, you realize we're going someplace.

So, when we find the blank and the nothingness when we're tracing lines - we have nothing - it's something that's so scarce that he can't have it. Whatever computation went with it, who cares. It's some form, some aesthetic, some something, which is a nothing as far as the preclear is concerned.

Well, we had another pc in here who was the age of 6, but retarded. The case I want to tell you about. This case - mother and two little children, they came in. I actually brought them in for interview and I learned a lesson.

All right. What does this have to do with a case who is interiorized? It's a case of havingness. You ask this pc to take a look at his body. Does he take a look at his body? Nnnn. He can't see his body. Now, just tie this up with running up the end of a communication line and finding no terminal. And then you work with a terminal and you work with a terminal and you work with a terminal; all of a sudden he develops a terminal. Isn't this strange?

I saw Bob Burns [George Burns] and Gracie Allen last night, and Bob Burns was talking about he always learned something when he tried to teach Gracie a lesson. In one of these particular cases he had involved himself in - somehow or another - in trying to teach her a lesson about a watch; about leaving her watch around. And he eventually had to go buy her another watch. And when he did it the last time it cost eighty dollars and this time it cost a hundred and twenty dollars, so he had now... His - the experience he gained out of this - he always learns something; somebody always learns something - was that watches now cost a hundred and twenty dollars. This is very analogous to what I learned yesterday.

Well, how do you do this? You put up nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing. Now blow up some nothings. If you really wanted to work hard at this, it gets very silly. You say, "Blow up some nothings." Okay, he blows up some nothings happily because he knows "nothing" can't blow up.

I learn this lesson every once in a while when I don't have an adequate receptionist. You'd be surprised, if you're setting up an office or something of the sort, how an orderly office receptionist setup on preclears, and so on, materially speeds and fixes up your processing.

And then you get nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, duplicate, duplicate, duplicate, dupli- . "Now blow those up." "Hah! All right, there's nothing there." Duplicate, duplicate, duplicate, duplicate, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing. "Now, now blow that up." "Wait a minute. There's the most curious thing here." It suddenly strikes him, now he's going to be curious about it. And he'll fight and fend around and talk about it and argue and so on. Well, you just keep him at work on duplicating whatever he's got there and blowing it up until eventually he realizes he's destroying something at the same time he's creating it. You ask him to duplicate it, so he can create it. "Well, blow up the duplicate." Well, he can destroy it. If he can create and destroy it, it can't be senior to him and it can't be dangerous to him, so therefore, "Well, let's take a look at the damn thing!" See, if we just go in on a gradient scale this way.

In the first place, the filling out of a form or two and the signing of a waiver or two of damages gets them into a certain mood. And if you have a printed or mimeographed form there, they're supposed to sign it out - former history, and so on - they're supposed to put their signature at the bottom of it, and you have a card for them to fill out with regard to an assessment, you see, that asked the very pertinent questions. We had these in the first Foundation, by the way, these cards. But it shouldn't be the auditor that fills these out. The person ought to fill those out when they come in the office before the auditor ever sees them. And then they hand this to the auditor, or it is handed to the auditor by a receptionist.

Well, what's this got to do with a fellow who's in his body and can't get out? Here's a question of havingness. What's this got to do with Acceptance Level Processing? A great deal. Because if you were to sit down and just shoot Acceptance Level Processing at a preclear, just hour after hour after hour, you'd practically shatter him. You'd practically finish him. It's lots of fun but he would get so bogged that you'd probably have a hard time bailing him out because he starts to go to pieces physically if he's nailed down in a body and you start running Acceptance Level Processing.

You would be amazed of the fact that a piece of paper, which now contains data (has been handed over), breaks down the case. It just, "Well, the fellow knows all about it now," or, "I wonder if I should have told him that on there?" And you'll see that immediately - "I wonder if I should have told him about it?" - you'll just see him on that because he'll keep watching the piece of paper. Invariable reaction, he just starts watching the piece of paper and looking at you and looking a little bit nervous about the whole thing, and then starts explaining to you the items on the piece of paper.

But sometimes, sometimes on one of these cases you start running Acceptance Level Processing and he will have a scarcity of something that is so apparent, right there, that it'll blow. And you can see how this is. He's nothing on the other end of a communication line. There's him to the body, see? There he is, there the body is with a collapsed terminal in between.

The second he does this, you better reach for an E-Meter because there's a sleeper here. And that is, there is something in this case he has not bothered to teach you. You can process that case, then, for about an hour or so, and then you say, "Well, that's the end of session," at which moment the case, with a gasp of relief or something of the sort, will give you the data you should have had at the beginning of the case and will depart hurriedly.

Now, the body essentially is a something with a nothing on the other end of a collapsed terminal - a thetan. And basically, he can't look at himself. That's where the nothing is.

This is why coming back twenty-four hours later is always a good, good deal.

All right. Let's just try this, just as a little stunt.

But you can watch this manifestation. If the person is made to fill out a slip of paper, regardless of what they're asked on the slip of paper, and so on, you will know immediately from their reactions whether or not they're withholding vital data, and that vital data may contain something of the order of paresis. This is a real one to run into. Of course, if you get on to something like that immediately, (that's syphilis or something of the sort, you know) some socially unmentionable thing that they think of; and the first thing you should do is simply waste syphilis. I mean, pam! Let's get that one settled right now. It doesn't take you very long to settle it, and the case is liable to come back to battery on just that, you see?

LRH: All right, John, put nothing behind your head. Nothing there again.

It's what they don't mention that they won't look at. And if you want to do a fast job on a case, a real fast job on a case - they very often are fending you off during the entire session, you see? You're not in communication with the case. It's very simple.

Well, let's duplicate it. Let's duplicate it again. Let's duplicate it again. Duplicate it again. Duplicate...

Well anyway, I learned - the experience I got yesterday, I've gotten often - and that is in the treating of children, keep Mama in the waiting room. You probably will learn this same thing several times before it's finally impressed upon you with sufficient velocity. Don't have her around when you're trying to process a kid. Just don't. Because you will spend all of your time talking to Mama and the second you start to process the kid, Mama starts to help out, and she helps out beautifully.

PC: What do you want me to do with the duplicates?

For instance, we had a little girl, brain injury at birth, and this would be the case of the shortchanged thetan. A thetan gets hold of this body and then it won't function or develop.

LRH: All right, just get a lot of duplicates there. Duplicates of nothing back of your head. Now, blow them all up. What do you get?

The thetan's pretty good but he's got the body in a motor rapport with everything a little kid sees. You know?

PC: What do you think?

You tell the kid to make a mock-up and make the mock-up do something. The mock-up does it all right, but the little kid turns around in a circle too, you see?

LRH: Well, what do you - what do...

If you tell the mock-up to wave, then the little kid waves. That's what's known as a motor rapport. It's actually an artificial - that can be artificially induced by mesmerism. Just stroking the muscle centers regularly of another person while facing them and looking them straight in the eye, and you'll get them up to a motor rapport to a point where if you surreptitiously reach behind your back and pinch yourself they will jump. What you've done is crossed energy deposits. It's very easy to perceive. But it's a very interesting manifestation.

PC: Nothing!

I'll go over that again. Mesmerism is accomplished by putting some person in a chair - the same type of chair you're sitting in, two upright chairs - and you bring them close enough to you so that your knees, one of your knees, is slightly interlocked with their two knees, you see? And then you simply monotonously start to stroke them from the shoulder down to the elbow, alternate sides - the left side, right side, left side, right side. And just a stroking motion, meantime looking them straight in the eye. And you say, "All right, now you can just concentrate..." - you can say anything you please, "Just concentrate on me," or something of the sort.

LRH: Okay. Now, is that real good, having nothing there, or bad?

The next thing you know the person goes goggle-eyed and it is a different condition than hypnotism because they're in a motor rapport with you.

PC: I don't know.

Now, if you were to - if you get a person in a real good motor rapport with you, and you start walking backwards across the room, they will walk backwards away from you. You stop; they stop. You put up your right hand; they'll put up their left hand - mirror image. You turn your head rapidly from right to left; they turn their head rapidly from right to left. You see, this is just mimicry.

LRH: All right, let's put nothing back of your head again. Now, let's duplicate it.

But you've induced a forced mimicry upon this person.

PC: Mm-hm.

Now, the odd manifestations in it consist of pinching yourself so that they can't see you, or anything of the sort, and they will jump with the pain and get a red spot in the same place. This is the work of Anton Mesmer - late part of the eighteenth century, almost totally neglected. The work of Charcot is of about 1835 (if I remember rightly) and that has to do with hypnotism, which is just making somebody concentrate on some sort of a mental image. They're different manifestations.

LRH: Duplicate it again. Again. Again. Again. Can you duplicate it easily?

Well, actually, you have to go back into the nineteenth century literature on the subject to even find mesmerism. You won't find it written up anyplace that I know of.

PC: No, it takes a little longer than that.

It seems to me that psychology, always searching for phenomena - data-data-data-data-data-should have dug this up. But, of course, they sort of can't look at crucial data.

LRH: Oh, it's-it's...

Anyway, this is the same thing as when somebody puts the Ping Meter probe on his cheek and then - there's no ping - and then somebody else concentrates on it and makes the connection, and all of a sudden there's a ping!

PC: It takes long enough to think it.

You ought to do that. You ought to do that. That's quite a revelation to somebody, It's all right to say, "Yes, this can be done," but when you all of a sudden realize that you are monitoring another body, it's quite a shock. It's the first - first meter, or any such arrangement, that has ever measured this - that - somebody monitoring somebody else's body. All right.

LRH: ... is it slowing down?

So, look at this. Any mental condition, any ability of the mind, the body, the thetan, can be exaggerated and fixed so as to amount to a neurosis or psychosis. You see? All it is, is a natural condition which is exaggerated to a point where there is no other condition. One loses, then, selectivity of conditions.

PC: No. It takes long enough to think of it.

It tells you that if you're going to do subjective processing, rehabilitation of selectivity of conditions, selectivity of types of emotion, like "Make that chair feel angry," are tremendous processes because they unfix one from various parts of the Tone Scale.

LRH: Oh, you have to have time to think. That's right.

The Tone Scale itself - chronic position on the Tone Scale - only concerns itself with an exaggeration of that ability. Don't think when you have loosened a person up so that he can again select, at will, all over the Tone Scale - just because he can select at will is no reason he won't ever hit a low tone again. The point is, he doesn't fix on a low tone. Volatility of emotion is a goal rather than fixity of emotion.

PC: Evidently.

Now, because certain conditions of the mind are selected out as psychosis and neurosis, you see, people consider, then, that any ability of the mind to do this is on the road to going potty. Everything, just everything across the boards, is then on the road to going nutty. All "nuttiness" is, is a fixed attention upon a condition and inhibition of other conditions.

LRH: Okay. Get some duplicates there of nothing.

So that if you've got fixed attention upon a moment in time, it would tend to bar out all other moments in time. And the biggest scarcity is the scarcity of attention. There's no reason why you couldn't go around fixing attention on the whole time track so as to bring every part of the time track, as represented by the facsimiles, into full life simultaneously on the whole track. No reason why you couldn't do this, look at every engram in the bank and have an opinion on every engram in the bank at the same instant, even though that's seventy-six trillion years' worth of bank. It doesn't matter, you see?

PC: I've got about ten.

But people believe that there is a scarcity of attention because they can't get other people to pay attention to them. And so they get the idea of scarcity of attention.

LRH: Blow them all up!

Every little kid gets this: Mama's attention isn't sufficient. Actually, if Mama was real good, she'd just make up a sort of a permanent mock-up of herself that would walk around and look at the kid, and the kid would be perfectly satisfied there was plenty of attention from Mama. After that the kid wouldn't bother Mama continually, you see?

PC: Mm-hm.

But there is scarcity of attention. So, scarcity of attention results in a complete fixity of attention because attention is so scarce that one doesn't have much of it and so it can be fixed upon any moment of heavy charge or heavy no-charge. The fellow had something, now doesn't have something. That's a heavy moment of no-charge.

LRH: What happens as you do this?

Now he doesn't have something, all of a sudden he has something (that he doesn't want particularly) resulting in a fixation of attention. And when a person believes - it's just that, no more and no less - it's just a belief in himself that he doesn't have enough attention to cover all these things at once, why, he gets into this kind of a situation. So, his chronic tone results.

PC: Oh, I feel a little shift.

Now, it is quite common for an individual to face this when he has been brought up Tone Scale. When he's been brought up Tone Scale, that merely means he can reach upper levels. Because fixed attention is the thing, people assume immediately that a 40.0 would be fixed on 40.0 - that's what a 40.0 would be, somebody fixed on 40.0. The poor dope! He'd really be in bad shape if he were fixed on 40.0 because all he could ever be was serene. And you know, that's awfully dull.

LRH: Mm-hm. All right. Let's put nothing back of your head. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Now blow that up.

A person's emotions tend to become more and more volatile.

PC: Mm-hm.

Well, people in this society are very, very afraid of emotion, and so they use the fact, "Now look, you're a Clear," or "You're supposed to be in good shape," to keep a person from getting angry; to keep a person from becoming anything. They're supposed to be just not there or something. A wonderful method, you see, of telling somebody, "Now because you're Clear," or something of the sort, "why, you can't emote anymore and you aren't there anymore and now we have complete control of you." Well, it doesn't work that way. They get madder, they get more apathetic, they weep harder and they get more bored and they get more enthusiastic oftener than other people. And this is very trying on people around them that aren't equally volatile. You see how that could be?

LRH: Now what do you got?

Now, a person becomes afraid of volatility because it means that he is unstable, and he has associated instability, you see, with a neurotic condition. Believe me, the most stable person in the world is this raving psychotic. He's really stable, he doesn't vary an inch either way.

PC: Nothing.

They also have heard of the "manic-depressive." People go around classifying themselves in psychiatric classifications - which is very amusing because the psychiatric classifications haven't any classification. And they say, "Well, I'm a manic-depressive, and therefore I go - when I feel good, I am in a manic; and when I don't feel good, I'm depressed." That's just wonderful, see? I mean, that's. the way human beings operate. When they feel good, they feel good; and when they don't feel good, they don't feel good. And we re saying the same thing, you see? Pam - pam!

LRH: Nothing. Good. Let's take that nothing and duplicate it. Duplicate it. Duplicate it. Duplicate it. Now what do you got?

For instance, somebody came up here the other day, a kid that has been borderlining around here for ages, and he's - his communication level is way up, but he's fixed himself on this same idea. He's put his attention on the fact of being a "40.0," just for ages. He'd been doing this for a long time. He - mysticism; he wanted to be very serene. He's following the same track and he's making Scientology fit into a bracket of mysticism. Well, this is very hard to do. It's something like cramming TNT and nitroglycerin into a paper bag and then wondering why the paper bag doesn't contain itself.

PC: A lot of duplicates of nothing.

Well, this fellow had gotten himself in the terrible condition of - he's just bored stiff of being serene. But he has to because that's what he's supposed to be, you see, and he's just all snarled up about it.

LRH: Blow them up.

So, I said, “All right, now put a couple of mock-ups out there and make them very painful."

PC: Mm-hm.

"No."

LRH: Okay. Let's put - what do you got there now?

What's this tell you? It tells you immediately the fellow's merely fixed someplace on the track if he can't put out a mock-up that has pain in it.

PC: Nothing. LRR: All right. Let's duplicate it.

And he's, "Well, there's nothing you can do about this," he says grimly.

PC: Mm-hm.

And I said, "Yes, there is." I said, "When you can put out enough mockups and when you can turn on the condition of sheer screaming agony and turn it off anyplace in your body at will, you will again be happy."

LRH: Duplicate it.

Heard from him a day or so later and he says, "You're right." He said, "Boy, I sure can hurt good!"

PC: I'm just keeping right on duplicating.

Now, there's - he's restored his volatility and restored his ability to be something else than what he is. And the only reason you're processing anybody is he's stuck at a point that he doesn't consider optimum and he wants to be something else. Well, the thing he can be, according to his viewpoint where he is, must be solid, you see, and again stuck - Q and A processing. His next state must also be fixed.

LRH: All right. Smash all those duplicates together with a terrific bang.

Well, his only salvation is to be any kind of a state you can think of. That's all. Now, if your processes return to him the ability to be volatile and use any and all emotions, why, and use any and all efforts and any and all pains, and so forth, why, gee, he gets into remarkably good condition in a hurry. What you're doing is unfixing him.

PC: Mm-hm.

Well, go back to this motor rapport. People who wear stylish hats are in, to some degree, a motor rapport. Agreement throughout the society gets into a motor rapport basis.

LRH: What happened?

Now, you wonder why - what mystic quality there is in "lav," (lav, that's Russian for love), what mystic quality there is about this that causes a fellow's emotions to shut off because some girl - or some girl's emotions to shut off - and they just become fixedly apathetic or just nothing after some sexual partner has gone his or her way, see?

PC: I feel like I've come up to the front of my face.

Well, now, let's look at the process of motor rapport - two people sitting on chairs facing each other, one looking into the eyes of the other with a stroking of the upper biceps, alternate left and right biceps.

LRH: Well, let's put nothing there again.

The sexual act approaches this very, very closely, believe me. And the absence of the other person tends to make a cessation of sensation. But here is a fixed situation - sensation - which was going on while they were together, and they're in a motor rapport.

PC: Mm-hm.

Well, the other person suddenly decides that all is lost, and they're very cold all of a sudden, sexually, toward this person, and then they go away.

LRH: And again. Now duplicate those two nothings.

Well, the thing to do is to do a valence shift to get the other person back.

PC: Mm-hm.

What people cannot have in actuality - in reality - this is the inverted mock-up - what a person can't have in actuality, he puts into a mock-up.

LRH: More duplicates.

First, he mocked up what he wanted in reality - that's higher toned, you see - and then after a while he gets into the fixed condition of an inverted business on mock-ups so that he is mocking up things which he can't have in actuality or reality. See, he has turned his actuality into a complete agreement with reality - the MEST universe. See, he's just copying the MEST universe now.

PC: Mm-hm.

Duplication, by the way, solves this. Lots and lots of duplication will invert this condition about mock-ups. You ought to do that. That is another, with Self Analysis, a neglected technique.

LRH: More duplicates.

People look at it and say, "Well, what on earth can you do with this? I mean, you keep making pictures alongside of pictures of the MEST universe. Well, it's silly!" If you'll notice, the pictures start out either nonexistent or quite different, and this person really has a devil's own time trying to get those things to exactly match the MEST universe. And what do you know, you'd say offhand, "Boy, that's very, very bad to get something that completely matches the MEST universe - a duplication which does."

PC: Mm-hm.

We must realize that it isn't a condition of being also able to match the MEST universe, it's the fact that they can't. They've gone negative on matching electrons. At least get them back up to the wavelength of an electron. Now, push them up this - up the line again, you see, so now they can match up all kinds of MEST objects and change them around. And this is the place where they get original. The other is "compulsive originality," as completely different from "spontaneous originality." Spontaneous - free originality.

LRH: More duplicates. More duplicates. Now smash all those together violently.

What happens to an artist? He slides this band and goes through MEST and down without recognizing where he crossed the border. The next thing you know, he's riding on craftsmanship and - or he's painting on craftsmanship, or he is doing music on craftsmanship. What's this?

PC: Mm-hm.

Now, he has to have a compulsive originality, so he buys a plot genie. He goes out and studies the compositions of Rembrandt van Gogh, or he does some - to remedy this situation.

LRH: Now, what do you get with that?

Well, now, you start duplication on that man, and he'll find out that he is so frightened of duplicating the MEST universe, you see? He's afraid of it. Well, that's where he's miring down. You've got to get him up to a point on duplication.

PC: Nothing

Well, most people who really get in bad shape are on an inverted dynamic about duplication.

LRH: Nothing again. Good. Let's put some nothing in back of your head. Got it?

Motor rapport is a complete duplication. So, when the marital partner or the sexual partner suddenly departs, one says, "I can't depart!" therefore, one must not duplicate! See how Q and A this is? One of these idiotic simplicities. This person has left and there's no more sensation with that person, so therefore, in order to Q and A it, why, the pc would have had to have left, but he can't leave, he's there. So, there's no sensation and he just can't be this person.

PC: Yeah, got lots of them.

When he went into a motor rapport with this person, this person was - he never really gets mixed up with anybody this way unless this person has quite a bit of sexual sensation to give off. You see, he gets into a "can't be" situation. The person leaves. He can't be, himself; gone. This other person meant sexual sensation, therefore, he can't be sexual sensation. He can't be gone, so he's in an unsolvable situation. The way to do it is when the sexual partner leaves, why, the only answer would be to have one's own body leave too, and that would solve the problem. But in view of the fact that one has a tendency to stay with the body, this problem doesn't solve that easily. See this Q and A at work? It's very simple. So the person winds up fixed in what? Fixed in a complete maybe. He's in a motor rapport with a person who isn't there, which means no sexual sensation.

LRH: Got a lot of them. Smash them together again. Now what do you got?

This is very curious. You should run this sometime because it's what led Sigmund Freud down the byroads and back alleys of the problem - and brought him some answers too. This is such a flagrant thing in a society which is divided into just two sexes. Of course, it's more randomity when you have three sexes. There's one society up the line that has three sexes. And there's extra chances.

PC: I haven't quite got them smashed yet.

But motor rapport is a physical compulsive mimicry. Now, when a person starts to go into motor rapport with his own mock-ups you know that there's pretty much of a scarcity of mock-ups and a scarcity of attention.

LRH: Well, it's easy to smash, they're all nothing.

Attention, see, attention; it's the keynote of it. The little kid that doesn't get attention will get heavy mock-ups.

PC: I know that.

Now, if you give a little bunch of kids Group Processing, you'll see a kid mock up a choo-choo train and then come flying down the aisle as a choo-choo train. He isn't being a choo-choo train, he's just in a motor rapport with his own mock-up. When you see a child doing that, you can say immediately, "This child is not getting attention and affection," period. That's all, it's the main answer.

LRH: Well, duplicate what you haven't got smashed now.

Lack of affection inhibits his ability to melt down his own mock-ups. He can't have affinity, he can't have affection, so therefore, he gets fixed on something. He can't admire it, he just looks at it, so therefore, he hangs up in it in energy. And this is fixation of... Admiration and attention are synonymous, practically, so he's just gone as far as he's concerned. Other people won't pay any attention to him.

PC: Mm-hm.

So you see how you'd spot this motor rapport in somebody?

LRH: Duplicate it again.

Well now, if you go around and talk to many psychiatrists - go around and interview psychiatrists - you'll find these poor devils are in motor rapport on psychosis. And you see, it's a perfectly natural thing for a person, when he's illustrating a story, to throw an expression on his face or make with the hands concerning some object in the story. But you see there's - if you want a classification of insanity, just classify all the things which you know the mind can do. And then, you see, you would just merely take these things and exaggerate each one and give it some kind of a name so that it would be an insanity. And its absence creates an insanity too.

PC: Mm-hm.

A compulsive absence or a compulsive presence are alike the same thing. Now, just - everybody gets mixed up on this. They're afraid of this thing called insanity, and nobody has a good grip on it. In the first place, it's an emotion which is floating around and is merely the way you twist energy. It's - put a certain tension on energy gives you an emotion called "the glee of insanity" which is the "glee of irresponsibility."

LRH: And again.

Well, that's not really what we're talking about. We're just talking about a compulsive fixation on one thing.

PC: Mm-hm.

And if you consider mental aberration as a compulsive coursing down one track, you have all the definition you need. It's a compulsive travel on a certain thing, subject or something of the sort. And people know this and they become frightened of fixing on something, and you'll find some of the boys who can't even pick up a hobby. They're afraid to get interested. See, if they got interested they know they'd fix on it and then they'd be crazy. This is the way they add it up.

LRH: And again.

So, you have people compulsively abstaining from living. And that applies to every Homo sapiens walking the face of Earth today. They're all abstaining from living because they're so afraid of dying. That's about the way it is.

PC: Mm-hm.

If you could ever recapture a moment of the complete motion, the complete wholehearted fling, flash, dash or concentration on just one thing, you'd suddenly realize that you'd been missing something.

LRH: And again. And again. Now slap all those together real hard.

Now, your pc is fixed, and when he gets fixed on a motor rapport basis, my God, he's really down there. Tells you an awful lot of little kids are really batty - and they are, too.

PC: Mm-hm.

They make up a mock-up, and then they - you tell them to tell the mock-up to turn around, and that makes the little kid turn around. He doesn't turn around because he's watching the mock-up. He makes the mock-up turn around and that makes him turn around.

LRH: Got that?

Well, this is something else taking place. The kid is making a stronger - has more control over the mock-up than he has over the body. And this would be a good condition for a thetan, wouldn't it? The kid has excellent control over mock-ups. He has excellent mock-ups, excellent control over mock-ups and practically no control over the body. So, therefore, he can turn the mock-up around, but his own body would just fly around with it, which tells you the GE spotting the mock-up would be in a motor rapport with it. So it's a condition that would have to do with the GE.

PC: Yeah.

How do you break it? It's a scarcity of attention. You mock up Mama facing the child, mock up Papa looking at the child. Now, they'll get Papa looking angry, and Mama looking at them censoriously. But you've got to get them - to get them to get Papa and Mama down below them looking at them admiringly. And when you can finally get them mocking up Papa and Mama like that, their motor rapport stops. The same thing with other children. You get them to mock up other children. You get this child to mock up - "All right, now mock up a little girl. Now have her jump up in the air." The little kid jumps up in the air.

LRH: Did they go together more easily that time? Good. Now, let's mock up nothing right where you are.

What's taken place there? The mock-up jumped up in the air. The thetan is much more able in controlling a mock-up than he is controlling the little child. The GE takes a look at a mock-up jumping up in the air and jumps. The thetan doesn't have anything to do with it.

PC: Mm-hm.

Here's a body out of control. Here's also a thetan counting on the GE to take care of himself. Which is to say, to some degree, an abandonment of the body at that early stage.

LRH: Nothing again.

When you get something like a brain injury or something badly wrong with a child so that everybody is treating the child in some curious way, the thetan will approximate the condition and the body will act that way afterwards. That's a funny thing. It isn't that a brain injury inhibits the thinking or talking of a child worth a nickel, you see? But it's just - that's the way it is, and the thetan just mocks the body up to act that way and he's in agreement. He's agreeing with everybody.

PC: Mm-hm.

What's motor rapport? It's just that compulsive mimicry.

LRH: Nothing again - just in the space coincident with your thinkingness.

This is the old saw that "you'd better not imitate people who are stammering because you will be stammering too. Ha-ha! Boy, are we going to work an operation on you." That's pushing a fellow, you see, into compulsive mimicry by making him afraid of compulsive mimicry. If you can make anybody afraid of anything, you can force it upon them. See? Well, anyway, just - I wanted to talk to you about that. But I wanted to impress upon you the fact that parents are really no help to you as an auditor in processing a child. And you ought to have the slip of paper all beautifully made out by Mama and handed in to the office, and you see the kid by yourself.

PC: Oh, not duplicating it.

Yesterday I spent about four and a half minutes processing two children. Got in a very beautiful session on two children. Two sessions I got in, in four and a half minutes.

LRH: All right. Space coincident with your thinkingness.

I put a big crimp in motor rapport with one kid and I broke a line charge on the other kid because I made the other kid control Mama's mock-up and make Mama look at her. See? This took two and a - about two minutes for one kid and about two and a half minutes for the other kid.

PC: Mm-hm.

Total processing, about four and a half minutes. And total result, not very great. But merely break the - one little kid's worry because Mama is so worried about the other little kid, that the first little kid isn't getting any attention, you see? So, we just remedied that condition. Remedies are awful quick with kids. There's practically no locks to blow on this lifetime. The kid line charged - pam - and relaxed.

LRH: All right. Duplicate what you've got there.

And the other kid finally got the whole alley down there filled up with little kids waving up, and so forth, and to some slight degree remedied this scarcity of children, but just slightly, see? And she got a line charge, and an expression she had across her eyes vanished! And she had a very fixed expression, sort of like that, and it vanished!

PC: Mm-hm.

Well, this wasn't very great advance on the cases but it wasn't much time to put in either. Because for the ensuing twenty-five and a half minutes of the thing, Mama talked. And the second time I tried to attract the kids' attention, and so forth, Mama had already learned a trick.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

"Now, see Mama down there," she says, "Now, Mama is now waving at you. Now, Mama is now out in the street. See Mama waving at you out in the street." Real grim!

PC: Mm-hm.

But Mama's real worry was about the husband. And the husband, you see, is a big problem, because he's one of these fellows that just keeps going and going and going and working and working and working. And the doctors all caution him, and she's cautioned him, and everybody's cautioned him, but he just keeps going and going and, "He's so ambitious, you see, and he just keeps building these things, and so forth. And, of course, it isn't so bad because he makes quite a bit of money doing it, but he just works, you know, and he just keeps going, and he keeps going, and isn't there some way you could stop him?" The beauty of working people outside who know nothing on the subject at all is that they act so much like people.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

See, her computation was lying all over the place.

PC: Mm-hm.

When Mama left - I hadn't noticed at the time because I was concentrated on the kids - I was backed away from my body a bit and sort of leaning on the wainscoting and taking a deep breath and all of a sudden realized that the room was speckled with the glee of insanity. So, I blew it up, and Mama was down the street by that time, and I flipped down there and took another look at her. I really hadn't looked at her because I was interested in the kids. And boy! it was from the nose back clear to within about a quarter of an inch of the back of the skull, just solid glee of insanity. The poor girl is about ready to flip her bonnet.

LRH: Again. Smash all those in.

The doctors have talked to her about a brain injury on the part of the child and she's so worried about a brain injury and going insane that she just pulled all the insanity out of the bank (she could find it anyplace) and takes it upon herself so the child won't go insane. Huhhh! The child's perfectly all right - controlled, better attention span than the other child who has no brain injury. You get this weird picture?

PC: Mm-hm.

Here's this child - she's a little bit retarded, but nothing very fantastic - with the doctors and nurses and school people, and so forth, "Yak-yak-yak-yak-yak! Brain injury at birth! Brain injury at birth!"

LRH: What happens?

If they'd just forget about it, the thetan would get that kid into shape. This is a body the thetan's got to work with and he was shortchanged one way or the other and it's growing up somehow, but he's trying to compensate for it - markedly trying to compensate. I keep saying him because the thetan was a boy in the last life. Anyway. Which makes a confusion. This guy is awful confused. He's got a girl on his hands who is six, but is - acts like about three and a half; four.

PC: Well, it just seems like a little tiny black point.

Well, out of these things one can learn quite a bit. But it's strange how often one learns the same lesson, and - no matter how many guises it takes.

LRH: Oh? Curious. Let's duplicate it. Let's duplicate it again.

And one is, that when you have somebody around who is doing a bad - well, he's just got to stop the husband, you see. Well, somebody like that is bound and determined that they're going to go in some weird direction with regard to children, and so on. At the same time her problem is quite actual. She's taking care of a couple kids there without any help. And one of the kids she's being pounded with, she can't send to school, and that's one of the main things that she's worrying about, the child is underfoot all the time and a constant attention demand.

PC: Yeah.

So, the problem that presents itself is who in this family - who in this family needs processing? We learn the same lesson all over again - Mama. Because any processing you give the kid, Mama's going to louse up.

LRH: Let's duplicate it.

She was told to encourage the little child to get pictures. So she now says "hello" to the pictures every time the little child says "hello" to the pictures and sets extra plates at the table for the mock-ups. Otherwise, she's not doing very much to drive this child batty. Any time you start to tell a little kid that you can see his mock-ups and you start treating them with more politeness and consideration than you're treating the little kid, you're in for trouble. And that's what this person's doing.

PC: Yeah.

Well, as long as we're on this subject, we have on the whole subject of attention also the subject of responsibility. How much responsibility can you expect from somebody who has a tremendous scarcity of attention? They want all the attention they can get and they are told that an enormous number of things cut down attention. "If you don't do that, Mama won't love you." "If you do that, Mama won't love you." "If you want Mama and Papa to like you, then you had better..." so on, so on, so on, so on.

LRH: Duplicate it.

Now, they get affection all mixed up, then, with attention, a scarcity of; and they just get completely scrambled to a point where any attention becomes more desirable than no attention.

PC: This could go on for about two hours and I'd have enough to fill up a cubic centimeter.

Well, when this starts to take place, when you have people looking all over the place for attention-attention- attention-attention, somebody has cut the living daylights out of their affinity lines. Pay attention to that affinity line because in actuality an affinity line isn't a line, as you would say an "affection line" or an "admiration line." Ideally, it is a no-line situation. So somebody has to...

LRH: Oh, I see. They're this tiny, huh?

I'm going to be very - much more specific about this. Get my language straightened up. Complete lookingness and just regard for - on a very, very high band - is itself affection, admiration, and so forth. What it is, it's synonymous with clear vision. But as you enter into the energy, there is a particle which can still be it, but that particle is less it than the no-line. See, the best communication line is no line at all.

PC: Yeah.

TBD Now - but so we enter in - we can get a line out of it. Now, it essentially is what lines are made out of. This sounds perhaps a little paradoxical or something of the sort, but it's what lines are made out of. Which is to say it's this tiny entrance particle which is getting jammed-jammed-jammed- jammed-jammed-jammed; now it's getting nice and solid. Boy, that line's really visible.

LRH: All right. Say you've gone for two hours now and have a cubic centimeter of it.

And when you first start to process a preclear on lines - he'll start to pull up lines - the first lines he will see, and the first emotions he will run into ordinarily are apathy. That's the heaviest mass of particles. And above that he will run into grief And above that he will run into fear. Sometime when you've spilled a beautiful grief charge, don't be too dismayed a little while later to find your preclear in terror, because that's just the next line up.

PC: Mm-hm, pepper.

You start pulling up lines on a pc, for heaven's sakes, pull them up the emotional band. Don't tell him what line you're looking for. These are just the lines he'll run into.

LRH: Got it?

And you say, "All right. Adjust your wavelength," you've got him exteriorized, "Adjust your wavelength and take a look for - take a look around and see if you can find a deposit of energy here or an old line or something of the sort." "Oh, an old line." Well, it'll run out and he'll find apathy on it. And then the next thing you know he'll find grief on it.

PC: Yeah.

On nearly every one of these things, as he comes up, you're asking him for the easiest thing for him to find, and he's finding tougher and tougher things.

LRH: All right. Come down on it real hard from all sides and smash it in on itself.

See, you ask him, "Well, get the next one that you can see." Any time you say, "you can see" or "adjust your wavelength to view," you realize that you're coming into the next zone which can be tackled. So you get a gradient scale of visibility which is your gradient scale of trouble with the case. See? I mean, if you use visio to locate - if you use exteriorized visio to locate what's wrong with a case, boy, you're really processing. Don't kid yourself; you really are. You're soaring along - wham! wham!

PC: It won't smash.

You'll knock out more things in less time than you ever heard of in running engrams or ridges. Gee! it's just - it's terrific speed!

LRH: It doesn't smash? Well, make a duplicate of what didn't smash.

And it goes up - what do you know - it just goes right on up scale. You shouldn't tell your preclear this because he'll go and - he'll go and try to locate them higher scale so as to skip them.

PC: Mm-hm.

You'll just take off the main charges on a rising scale, and you're just getting a less heavy particle each time. Of course, you get to hate. You think hate is heavier than apathy, perhaps, just by the world's connotation of it, but it isn't - it isn't. It's already - it's just already a sort of an apathy because, you see, if a person is hating, he's already saying, "I can't do anything about it, and I have to hold and resist and force upon." That's hate.

LRH: And a duplicate of that.

And you come up the line. All this energy is getting liver. You're now going into more violent energy but it's always much easier to handle.

PC: Yeah.

Hate's very easy to handle. You can always get a preclear - just tell him to empty a few buckets of hate over himself. He finds out this is tremendously acceptable at first. That's a funny thing, they just empty a few buckets of hate or throw a few buckets of hate away. He'll wonder how to waste hate, and he can figure for a long time, because it's a solid ridge, and of course that's all it is, is figure-figure-figure-figure-figure. If you've ever seen anybody trying to figure out how to get revenge or if you read detective stories, or so forth, it immediately tells you that the thing is a solid ridge from one end to the other. Well, just skip the ridge and just get a bucketful of hate, which makes some kind of a liquid - different from a ridge.

LRH: And a duplicate of that.

This has an effect, by the way, it's curious. Get him throwing buckets of hate on somebody or other, and buckets... He really starts getting the emotion of hate, too, if you do this - wonderful emotion.

PC: Mm-hm.

A wonderful process in Germany. It worked like mad on Germans, because they'd been hated and hated and hated and they finally got an acceptance level on that. It's real good.

LRH: A duplicate of that.

Well, you're dealing all the time with affinity. And you're dealing with some kind of a particle of admiration. Any one of these particles is better than no looking. Any one.

PC: Mm-hm.

See, it's just a - it's just what is less valuable; not what is valuable and what is not valuable. Any particle on the Tone Scale that has to do with an effort or emotion has tremendous value for the thetan. Because boy, if he's got particles hanging around he's already got them scarce.

LRH: Take the last duplicate and smash it.

You find out, by the way, people won't tear up and throw away ridges whatever their content. Their content makes them just completely miserable. They won't throw it away. Well, it's sensation! It's emotion! It tells them they're alive!

PC: Mm-hm.

But more than that, it ruins their havingness. They think they have to have, and the body thinks it has to have, just so much deposit of energy. And you start tearing up too many ridges and start throwing away too many lines - sort of on this same line of throwing away lines - you start throwing too many lines without giving him back the ability to replace them at once and at will, and he'll start to revolt on you a little bit. And he'll get sadder and sadder and more and more apathetic, and more and more apathetic. He'll get real sad. Because you re knocking his havingness apart. It's exactly the same thing to a thetan as though you were to grab his purse or his tie or to grab his car or something like that, and you all of a sudden have laid heavy hands on one of his ridges. Well, that ridge isn't very valuable because he can - kind of apathetic about it - he thinks he can probably get another one someplace, steal one off Joe. But he doesn't have much confidence at first in his ability to make good, solid, heavy ridges.

LRH: Did it smash easily?

So, every time you tear up a line or a ridge, give him back the option of having it again. That's a little rule you should follow. Any time you take away a deposit of energy, make it possible for him either to have the energy at will - any time he wants it - or give him back the energy itself. And before you've got him up the band very high you'd better just give him back the energy itself.

PC: Mm-hm.

You blow up this ridge with all the facsimiles on it and then you have him mock up a ridge - just mock up a good, solid, heavy ridge - and pat it into shape, and push it down and make it about as solid as he wants without exploding it and fit it back in the same position. And he'd do that a few times and all of a sudden he says, "Well, I can have lots of those - the hell with them." But just do that as you come up Tone Scale.

LRH: All right. Smash all the other duplicates and the original together.

That's why subjective processing, so-called, is destructive to a case, because you're asking the case to destroy, chew up, throw away, mangle and get rid of his havingness. And you shouldn't do that. You should be mocking it up.

PC: Mm-hm.

Self Analysis becomes very satisfying from two levels, its anchor points, and so on. It's great. It's a fantastic thing but it gives the person space. I had a whole list of these one time. One time I sat down and thought of all these processes I was trying to do, and it's all being done by one process, if slowly: Self Analysis.

LRH: What happened as you did that?

When he starts getting mock-ups, you see, they're mass - increases his havingness, so he gets over his scarcity of energy.

PC: Well, it seemed like a peace pipe.

Now, as you come on up the scale he'll hit these various higher lines. He'll start hitting dispersals. He doesn't have to exhibit terror. The behavior of energy at 1.1, and so on, is dispersal. So, all of a sudden he'll tell you, "Gee-whiz! There's just miles of energy going out," or "just flows and floods of it." Well, just fix it up for - so he can have a dispersal.

LRH: A peace pipe, huh?

One of the more interesting ways to do it we went into yesterday. I wouldn't do it on a preclear who was downscale, I mean, but this - you can do anything you want with energy. But to make a - if you start waves of dispersals going out following one after the other, and then get about a dozen on the way and get them all flowing out into the infinite space and then suddenly stop the first wave you started, which is the leading wave, it makes (it was real interesting) - everything runs into it and you get a lovely ridge or you get a wonderful explosion. See how that is?

PC: Just before I smashed it.

You just like - just have the preclear put out expanding doughnuts, and he keeps dropping a new doughnut to expand and a new doughnut to expand and a new doughnut to expand and then just stop the first one that you've dropped in; all the other doughnuts will run into it, of course. It's quite fireworksy.

LRH: Hm?

Now, that's a dispersal and, of course, that is at fear. Well, that's one of the ways of handling fear. You wouldn't think so offhand because the person isn't getting any real emotion of fear. He just...

PC: Yeah.

Did you ever see anybody at a movie getting deliciously frightened? Well, they've just got a lot of energy to expend. They can have dispersals at will. Start and stop dispersals. People only become afraid of being afraid (which is about the worst thing that could happen to anybody) when they can no longer have dispersals and start and stop them at will. If you were to fix up people so they could have these dispersals - slow dispersals, fast dispersals, it doesn't matter. An explosion is the best dispersal. It's curing people of fear. And when you cure people of fear, that he can have a dispersal any time he wants a dispersal, he doesn't have to be afraid of being afraid anymore.

LRH: Just before you smashed it. What have you got left after your smash?

And you can feed him explosions and he, one day, will integrate that fact. He'll say, "You know, I'm not scared of things anymore. I don't know why!" And you say, "Well, it's obvious. It doesn't need any further explanation because it always works out this way." You say, "Well, gee. That's interesting. I don't have to worry about this preclear because naturally the most - the thing he really was afraid of was an explosion, and I gave him enough explosions and he's not afraid of explosions anymore, so that's just fine." That's the way you rationalize it. That isn't quite the way the logic went.

PC: Nothing.

The logic simply went "that you gave him dispersals until he could have some." See, now he doesn't have to be afraid of being afraid.

LRH: You got that nothing?

Because if you're afraid and can't have a dispersal, then there isn't any way to express the emotion so you get hung up. So that's a perfect trap. If you can't have a dispersal and the dispersals all stop, then you're afraid of dispersals which is afraid of being afraid. So therefore you can't have explosions!

PC: That's right.

And explosions are beautiful and practically the only reason you're alive. And if it wasn't for explosions no cell in the body would function. If it wasn't for explosions no bus down on the road would be running. If you can't have explosions you've got to wreck machinery. It's fantastic the role of the explosion in this universe.

LRH: Well, good! Let's just mock that nothing up as a duplicate.

This is all supposed to be an expanding universe. The guy that dreamed that up, by the way, is probably real short on explosions because the universe also implodes, of course. It isn't an expanding universe. It isn't a contracting universe. It just happens to be a universe. And it's not sitting in somebody else's space or it's - anything. It just happens to be a unit of space that invaded our units of space and we've got a universe. Or it's a unit of space which we made and made to invade our unit of space, and it provided a lot of randomity, and here it is, so we might as well do something with it. Anyway. Or we own it completely; it doesn't matter how we look at it.

PC: Mm-hm.

It's interesting that if you can get up a person's level of certainty that he can change his mind. And all the processing you need, you see - if you get him real up and outside of his body - is just he changes his mind about something. Well, that's the same thing as looking. That says that he can look at something else. That's all changing a mind is. You can look at something else. You can also look at the first thing while you're looking at something else. That's - you can also look at five or six things at the same time, and compare them all at the same time, run them together and combine their visios with one viewpoint. It's fantastic. But people, when they're thinking, are combining billions of viewpoints simultaneously. They're combining all these viewpoints and getting some filtered result.

LRH: Another duplicate.

Now, you want to know what "thinking" is? It's a bunch of - a bunch of looking of a bunch of viewpoints which are all being filtered through one viewpoint, and the cockeyed scene that is viewed there for the last viewpoint is what the fellow thinks. And that's a thinking machine. It's very nicely designed.

PC: Mm-hm.

Now, compare this to looking. The fellow is sitting up in the middle of some terrific piece of space he's just built and he can look at ten things on the space simultaneously. He can look into ten areas. Well, he finds it annoying to have to split his attention ten different ways, so he thinks maybe it'd be interesting if he puts up a unit, which is himself now, and has it look at ten things simultaneously and he looks at it. That's real cute.

LRH: And another duplicate of that.

Did you ever see one of these kaleidoscopes that the kids spin around and look through and the colors all combine and that sort of thing? Well, that sort of makes one of these kaleidoscopes, you see? And he can stand back and look at the thing. And then he finds out that he'd better differentiate between the ten things he was looking at while looking at this viewpoint which he has set up. Now that's going to be quite a trick, isn't it? It's a nice problem and it keeps his mind occupied.

PC: Mm-hm.

That reminds me that Mama, yesterday - a very, very pleasant woman, very well educated, and so forth - yet used the word problem about every fifth or sixth word. "Problem child; this is a problem; that is a problem; something or other is a problem; problem-problem-problem-problem-problem-problem- problem." And you got the idea of looking at this huge battery of circuits, each one going under full steam, full blast, and each one with a terrific energy cone sitting on top of it squashing it flat. And this was - this was quite a thinking machine that was going there. It was liable to blow up at any moment.

LRH: And a duplicate of that.

Now, a thetan doesn't happen to need any filtering to do any thinking. But he doesn't have to do any thinking, and he doesn't. He just does looking.

PC: Yeah.

Any time that you think anybody thinks, have them look at this basis of "All right, let's look at the ashtray. Now, let's look at this package of cigarettes. Now let's look at this box. Okay, now we're looking at those things. Now, we can look at that, and we can get the idea we're looking at that while we look at the cigarettes. Yeah, we can get the idea we're now looking at the cigarettes too, and we go over here on this box over here and we get the idea we're looking at all three things simultaneously."

LRH: And a duplicate of that.

And he'll try to cheat on you if he's very scarce of attention and try to flick his attention from one thing to the other back and forth. He isn't doing that.

PC: Yeah.

Now, you say, now, "You find that's kind of - kind of difficult to look at those three things at once with one pair of MEST eyes? Well, I tell you, let's put a viewpoint in the center that combines all three and look at it."

LRH: And a duplicate of that. Now knock all those duplicates together suddenly.

He'll get interested. See, it's an exercise. That's a thinking machine - the way you derive thinking out of looking. Just look at this thing and, of course, it's a mess of boxes and it's turning around and it's shifting because he's already said that these things were varying - that his viewpoint was changing on these three objects out here - so therefore, the viewpoint that he's set up here to watch those three things, when you look at the mirror image of it, why, you're going to get a shifting pattern which is not quite distinguishable.

PC: Yep.

You know that people have mirrors all around them? I don't give you this on an hypnotic level, or anything of this sort, but if you'll just casually look around you now, thetawise, if you'd just look around you, tell me if you do, honestly, if you find any mirrors.

LRH: Okay. What did you get when you did that?

What are they reflecting?

PC: Intersection - the lines intersection.

Male voice: The body.

LRH: Have you got a line intersection there now?

Mm-hm.

PC: Mm-hm.

Male voice: Mine's reflecting space opera.

LRH: Good. Let's duplicate the line. Duplicate it again. And again. Again. Again. Again. Now take the two ends of this line and join them both together - the original line.

Now, if you want to really have a rough time for a pc - those are just viewpoints - if you really want to make a pc feel real bad, make him bust one. Just make him pick up one of those mirrors - they sometimes have handles on them, and so forth - just make him break one.

PC: The original, which one's that?

You can ask somebody that comes in, you can just say, "By the way, do you ever have the idea that you have any mirrors sitting around?" And he looks around, and he - "Yes, yes, I have some mirrors around. It's funny, I never noticed this before. Let's see, this one over here - that's funny, it's not reflecting the right side of my body."

LRH: Oh, you can't tell them apart now. Good. Just take all those lines and join all their ends together.

Somebody with no visio at all will find these, by the way, and see his image in them and he'll say, "Gee, that - that - this one on the left side is reflecting the right side of my body. How peculiar." And he gets very intrigued. He gets very interested.

PC: Okay.

These are sort of the last ditch of "what I will be interested in if I just get completely horribly bored!" But you ask him to break one or dispose of one - he can pick them up and turn them around, and that sort of thing.

LRH: Got that real good?

They are made out of the centers of explosions.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Got a sort of a big loop or circle or something?

PC: Well, I've got a lot of loops.

LRH: You've got a lot of them, huh? Come down on them with a big smash.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: What happens?

PC: Mm, like a piece of string with a knot in it.

LRH: Made it real small. Duplicate that.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: And again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Again. And again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Again. Now, roll all those duplicates together and then arrange them as a cube of space.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Got that cube of space? Now, put yourself in the middle of it.

PC: I guess.

LRR: Got it?

PC: I guess!

LRII: All right. Yank all those down on you suddenly.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Do you like that? What do you have left as you do that?

PC: Nothing. LRH: Hm?

PC: Nothing.

LILH: They all disappeared again?

PC: Well, l made them into a cube of space - I kind of disappeared them. You see how that - I'm - what I mean, I just made a chunk of space out of them.

LRH: Oh, I see. Well, why don't you get them back again and put them around as eight...

PC: All right.

LRH: ...anchor points.

PC: Oh, all right.

LRH: How did you have this cube of space, by the way?

PC: Just a little cube of space.

LRH: Yeah.

PC: ... about an inch in diameter.

LRH: A little cube of space?

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Which direction is it from you right now?

PC: Well, I tried to have it where I was.

LRH: Okay. Let's put these eight anchor points - these eight cubes - get eight cubes just exactly like you made before - and put those around you.

88 PC: All right.

LRH: You got those? Yank those in on yourself suddenly.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Come in easily?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: No resistance to them at all?

PC: No,. there wasn't at all.

LRH: Hm? Good. Good. What do you got left?

PC: I've got this string waiting around here.

LRH: All right. Duplicate the string.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: And again.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: And again.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: And again.

PC: Mm.

LRH: And again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Give it a yank so it gets longer.

PC: Okay.

LRH: Did it get longer?

PC: Yeah.

LRH: You didn't believe it did.

PC: Well, I believe it as well as I believe any of the rest of this stuff.

LRH: Yeah?

PC: Sure.

LRH: Oh, you mean this stuff's giving you a little trouble, huh?

PC: Well, I don't see any of it.

LRH: You don't see any of it.

PC: I get an idea.

LRH: Oh, you get an idea. Duplicate that idea of it.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Duplicate it again.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: All right. Now smash all these duplicates together.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: What happened?

PC: Oh, got a little mass, seems like, to it.

LRH: You got a little mass there?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Well, duplicate it.

PC: Mm-hm.

LURH And again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: And again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: And again. Now, we get you playing "Ring-Around-the-Rosy," around it.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Can you do that? Doesn't seem to interest you.

PC: Well, I don't know...

LRH: You got it real good there?

PC: Yeah, I got it stacked like a stack of soda crackers.

LRH: You have, huh?

PC: Yeah.

LRH: All right. Now grab it suddenly and keep it from exploding. What happened?

PC: Well, I just got an idea of "hanging on for dear life." If it was about to explode, I don't see why I was hanging on.

LRH: Now, what have you got there?

PC: Well...

LRH: This string developed any?

PC: Well, it's not a string anymore.

LRH: What is it?

PC: Well, let's see. First it was some ideas and then I smashed those down; it got like a little wafer and then I made a bunch of duplicates like a stack of crackers. : LRH: Now what is it?

PC: The same.

LRH: Just a stack of duplicates?

PC: That's right.

LRH: Well, grab it quick again and keep it from exploding.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Make a quick lunge at it again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRR: Another quick lunge at it.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Another one.

PC: It's only about this thick now.

LRH: Make another lunge at it.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Is it disappearing? Huh?

PC: It's just about gone.

LRH: Just about gone, that's too bad.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Well, blow it up.

PC: Okay.

LRH: Did it blow up nicely?

PC: It's gone.

LRH: It's gone. Okay. This gives you no - does this give you any idea there might be a communication line around there anyplace? PC: No, it didn't.

LRH: It didn't, huh?

PC: To me - to me there isn't any.

LRH: Okay.

PC: But...

LRH: All I was trying to do was develop a line...

PC: What it does do...

LRH: ... to tell you what I was doing. Trying to develop a line so we could find nothing at the end of it. What was it doing?

PC: Well, what it does do is it - I kind of get an idea of more substance to these things than there is to my mock-ups.

LRH: Oh. That's real interesting. Good.

PC: There's not much substance.

LRH: No, nobody's finding you with any substance.

PC: There's more.

All right. This one carried on and on and on and on and on and on, far longer than I'm willing to carry it on, will - at this time - will eventually develop with the preclear a piece of communication line. Now, he starts developing and stops developing, and so forth, and he'll eventually get an expanded line of some sort or another. He'll be at the other end of it - the first thing that he associates with him. But he won't associate himself with it. He'll be "no responsibility." And this is the case of "all lines" and so forth. And when we're searching for a total responsibility, we're searching, at the end of every line, an identification with the terminal.

Now, you see the analogy between nothing at the end of a communication line and a person not getting out of his body. Do you see an analogy there? Well, do you see an analogy with no communication lines of any kind, and a possible development of a communication line? It's the same, same gradient scale, see? Nothing and then - a nothingness of communication lines and then the semblances and so forth of communication lines and then gradually, little by little, more and more of the preclear.

PC: You get wisps. The first time that I imploded just a nothing behind my head, well, it just seemed like wisps of smoke back there.

LRH: Okay. This is just no effort, really, to get somebody to look, but this is giving him as much at a time as he will look at, that's all.

PC: That's right.

So you just might as well settle down for a long haul on that kind of processing. Perfectly good processing, by the way. And if a case is - doesn't exteriorize, sometimes you run that processing for a very short time and the guy will suddenly exteriorize. That's all there is to that.

Now, let's add this up about acceptance level and havingness. Now, we know that anything a person has been thoroughly denied becomes scarce with him or nonexistent. Well, that's somebody else putting up a screen for him to protect him from something. And the screen will have in it something on the order of "no soda crackers." (He's mentioned soda crackers, all right.) He's got - obviously had no soda crackers and then he could have a soda cracker. All right. So we're just busting through screens, screens, screens, screens, screens and it develops on to Acceptance Level Processing.

Once in a while somebody will say, "Licorice. What am I expected to do with all this licorice?" or "What am I expected to do with this or that?" He's just come into the possession of licorice. And if he were to think about it for a moment, he'd feel kind of pleased (if you called it to his attention). You don't have to call it to his attention though, it just passes away.

Now, here's your acceptance level building up. What I'm trying to show you is it's the bottom rung of automaticity. This is automaticity in operation. It's automatic automaticity, if you want to call it that. Well, the process which simply unveils automaticity, minute after minute and yard after yard, and so forth, will eventually wind up with less automatic operation of the body and more self-determined preclear. That's obvious, isn't it?

Well now, let's just take the horns by the bull and stab the preclear straight to the heart. What can't he have? He builds up a screen against soda crackers. You throw a soda cracker in front of him; you find soda crackers on the E-Meter - pang - charge on soda crackers. All right, you just have him mock up soda crackers, soda crackers, soda crackers, soda crackers. All of a sudden they seem to be going into some section of blackness - pong, pong, pong. And the next thing you know, an old force screen or something will appear which was set up there to resist soda crackers. Of course, soda crackers is not something that people just put up force screens to resist usually, but it's much worse that they are resisting.

For instance, sex. People are walking around all the time, they wonder why they have a sexual anesthesia - some of these cases that do have one - they don't get any fun out of sex anymore. Well, if you just start having them mock up everything connected with sex, in shape and form and size, they'll all of a sudden find these mock-ups - well, they - the mock-ups at first won't exist - no existence, no existence, no existence, none, none, none, none.

You say, "Well, just keep putting them there. Keep putting them there. Put some more there. Put some more there. More. More." All of a sudden they say, "Well, now it's getting - it's very funny, it stays there for a moment."

Now, if you keep this up, in a moment or two - I mean, in a few minutes you ask them, "All right. Now what are the mock-ups doing?" They say, "Well, you know, there just seems to be a vacuum cleaner sitting around here someplace."

You get that? It sets up a force screen. That which a person resists he eventually gets a starvation for. This is a starvation screen. You want to know what I mean by hunger? He resists something, that makes it scarce, and then he'll get hungry for it.

This is a heck of a note. This is why electric shock is so effective on insane people. You hit them with a hard shock, you see, and they set up a resistance of being shocked while they're dragged in there, you see? And then the shock hits them and then they get a hunger for electric shocks. And you know, they'll come back for their electric shocks just as regular as clockwork. They can let them go anyplace and say, "You be back Thesday for your electric shock," and they report right back for their electric shocks, see? Because the screens that they're setting up every time are so quick - they sell themselves they can't have a shock and it creates an instantaneous hunger for a shock. You get the force involved with it. The force is so great.

The worst thing in the world you could do for anybody in that condition is to give him a heavy jolt of MEST - easily the worst thing, see? You just have to turn every reason that anybody ever thought of inside out to figure out an electric shock. But the patient gets a hunger for electric shock machines. And that's all there are to it.

He doesn't want them, the force screen is caved in on him, and the caving is so violent that it creates a vacuum, and the vacuum is created - an electronic vacuum - and this is created by an electric shock so that the only thing that fills the vacuum is electric shock.

Now, what's that got to do with electronics? Every once in a while you get a preclear who has - seems to get an absolute thirst for electronics. They're - every time you turn around, they're in a new electronic.

"Oh, boy!" you say, "For God's sakes!" so on. Well, the way to do it is just have them rig up electronics that same way. "Mock up an electronic. Mock up an electronic. Mock up another electronic facsimile. Now mock up big machines, and all this sort of thing," - electronics, see? And you'll see them going into the bank, slurp, slurp, slurp. And the next thing you know there'll be heavy jolts and that sort of thing, and the fellow has fulfilled some of his acceptance level of living. It isn't just a - his acceptance level: What's his acceptance level? Shocks.

Now, this business of having to waste things before he can have them is an assurance that they exist. See, it's an indirect method of observing them, that's all. And it answers up on the subject of waste. Well, there's a lot deeper reason and significance to it than that. The best significance to it is that it works.

Now, let's take, then, what this preclear really can't have. He compulsively comes back and grabs bodies, but he can't have one, they don't exist. He has physical anesthesia. He can't have a body.

Now, in Acceptance Level Processing, unlike Expanded GITA - Expanded GITA is a bit different. You waste things before you can have them. But Acceptance Level Processing is just an effort to determine what grade of the object - when you're hitting at a real object, see, real direct - you vary the grade, that is you vary the quality of the object until he can accept it, rather than waste it first, you see? You vary the quality of the object. Now, that is the significant difference. It's done in brackets of five just like everything else is.

But what is the quality of the object? Now, if you can find the quality of the object that he will accept - like an egg. The person can't have an egg. You've found out that he has an allergy to eggs. All right. You'll find out that he can accept some kind of egg. You know he's going to be able to accept some kind of egg. But you just start downstairs on eggs. Of course you go immediately into rotten eggs, and maybe he can accept rotten eggs. That's good. And you just let him accept rotten eggs till he can accept good eggs. Simple.

But usually if there's an allergy to it, it's a little worse than that. So it'd be a rotten egg where the chicken was about to be hatched and died and is now lying in there all decayed. And he can't quite accept this but if you put mold over the outside of the - you see, you're caving in a lot of screens at once - if you put mold over the eggshell and then if you were to paint it with some unmentionable subject, and so forth, he's going to be able to accept some portion of this.

Of course, you can be fully prepared, after he's all through, to get the dead chicken, whatever the unmentionable stuff was the egg was painted with, and the mold - they're all gone - and there sits, very purely, an eggshell. He can't accept it. I mean, here we go. I mean, you could be prepared for that sort of thing to happen.

But what the preclear can't have, of course, on an inverted dynamic... If he's in a body, you're just trying to exteriorize him; and when we get this specialized, why, what he can't have, of course, is a body. This is terribly elementary. He's in a body and you're asking him to get out of the body and he can't get out of a body because he hasn't got a body.

That's what no responsibility is. He is on the basis of "I am not and I do not have a body and I am sitting in nothing, but I am alive and going through life."

How does he account for this? Well, he goes through and accounts for it on the basis that he is a stimulus-response mechanism which is being guided by the social world around him and he is under the influence and effect of the world around him, and this accounts for every and any impulse of thinkingness or anything else that he has.

What is the level of psychology and psychologists on the subject of bodies? Right there. They don't exist and they can't have one and there are no communication lines, therefore, from themselves to the body; and the body is thereby and therefore solely monitored on stimulus-response mechanisms coming in from the environment. And in addition to that, it's all monitored by some mysterious entity known as God, or something, who started it all out. And you have adjustment to the environment by psychology. This is about as degraded as you could get, but they've managed it.

Now, their acceptance level is fantastic. They're even "can't survive" on a body they can't have. They have to go out, in psychoanalysis, into the second dynamic, which is the future. They not only can't have a body, but the body they can't have can't survive as itself so they have to concentrate on the second dynamic. But everybody knows the second dynamic is no good because that's all anesthesed too, so we have to go off into cravings which stem from an extended second dynamic - which doesn't exist - and, of course, the cravings are forbidden by the society, so you get a dead end. So that is how they say apathy is produced.

This is how - how far can you get from not having? But that's all you're leaving is - you're leaving from the point of being able to have, and then as the person goes down the line on deterioration, why, you get this sort of thing. They go down the line on the dynamics: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight. They can't have a body but they can have God. Now, that's all the way out the line. But intervening, they can't have themselves, they can't have a communication line in themselves because they don't exist. Now we get to the first dynamic as represented by a body. Now we're already inverted, so we can't have a body, and this body we can't have, can't survive either - it's very frail and not dangerous to the environment - so we have to go into the second dynamic. And we find out that there is - one can't have babies, that's just unthinkable - have babies. So we've barred on can't - on a "can't survive" there, as a "can't survive" on babies, so we have to go into sex itself and account for it as a sensation. And then, of course, there isn't any sensation in it unless it itself is a bit twist- . But there's no sensation that way because the society bars that out. So we have to look for it in a group.

Now, we get a basis of we can't survive in a group because politics and so forth are all balderdash, and we can't get anywhere like that, so we can't survive in groups, so we can't have a group.

So we look over here and we find we can't have man. The reason we can't have man is man is stupid and he's here for a very short time and he can't survive and he is prone to be destroyed in a very short time anyway by atomic warfare, so we can't have man.

Now, that's all very interesting, but if - see what we can have here. Let's get the level of acceptance. We go out from can't have man - fourth dynamic - to animals. And of course, it was very cute to have puppies and cats and that sort of thing when one was a very, very little child, but, of course, "one isn't a child anymore, and they're too much trouble, and one always loses one's pets anyway," so he can't have any pets, so that's a can't survive on the fifth dynamic.

Now, the MEST universe is all very well but it's all illusion. Well, one doesn't want an illusion, so he can't have an illusion. And when he was very young, why, Christ was all right, he was very friendly, as a matter of fact, and so on. But that's mostly - people, you know, they have to believe in that sort of thing. And they did once, but it requires nothing but faith and, of course, they can't have any faith anymore and they did have hopes on that once in a while, but actually religion doesn't lead anybody anyplace in the final analysis because you never get your wish anyway so, of course, one can't survive on the basis of spirits and religion, and so forth.

So that leaves just, of course, God. "And, of course, God naturally exists because there is all this space around here and this space is obviously surviving so, of course, it's obviously surviving. Of course, the space itself is liable to collapse. But the prime mover unmoved is not liable to collapse because he created all this, and maybe he can't either." And nobody yet has come up with as flat a "can't survive" as "God will never again be able to create another MEST universe." But if we mentioned it, brother, it'd be out in the streets.

"It is highly unlikely that God, having created this universe, will be able to create another one. After all, look at the lesson he's learned from looking at man down through the ages." If you were to start beating the pulpit on that you would really see some apathy, because when they go all the way out on the inverted dynamics, they get out to that one, and God, he survives.

And you go down to the sanitarium, the boys who are completely inverted on all eight, so on, they can turn to just one, one location. You can't even take Christ in a sanitarium. There's nobody going to do anything about Christ, particularly. If you find anybody there "he is Christ," he's already completely inverted on it, see?

Okay. What's this a problem of then? It's a problem of havingness on the inverted dynamics. If you just wanted to turn all these things around and run Acceptance Level in brackets on any preclear who simply couldn't get out of his head, you're going to be able to turn all these things around and just wind up back up the track again.

Fortunately, the people with whom you have to deal and the techniques with which you are dealing - present moment - are sufficiently strong so that you could start in, in full stride. You don't have to go through too much of this. But let me assure you that that I have just given you as the reductio ad absurdum of the case - remember it, because it's the inverted dynamics, in brackets, on Acceptance Level Processing.

Some day, in dumb desperation or other, you may all of a sudden find somebody who doesn't respond anyplace but the seventh or eighth so completely that it's only the seventh or eighth in a completely debased form that he can accept. Now, remember that. You'll even have to get the seventh and eighth.

You're trying to get this fellow to have a body so he can get out of it. This is the same thing I've been talking to you about for days. It's just another method of attack on the same problem.

All right. Acceptance level. Pc dropped in - processed some little time ago, the other day - and I ran her for about ten, fifteen minutes. This auditor had run Expanded GITA on her, just ad nauseam, and it had turned on considerable nausea. She was in bad shape. So on the basis of the fact that the "hair of the dog that bit him" is the best cure, why, I fed her some more Expanded GITA and snapped her out of it. Odd part of it was that her eyes, and so forth, had hung into the color and she'd stayed stable through this. She was just sick physically. So I hit it right where it was and got her to accept healthy bodies. It was an immediate result. This case exteriorizes, by the way.

"All right. Healthy body. Get another healthy body, put it in the chair there. Another healthy body. Another one. Another one. Another one. Another one." This case is getting sick by this time, see? "Another healthy body." Oh, boy. Oh, boy. Getting real sick. Getting much sicker. And suddenly the gastric juices were in contest with one another and she was getting into a rather desperate look on her face as she picked up gaily another healthy body and another healthy body, and she was putting them on, you see, sitting there in the chair, one after the other. And this was getting horrible. She was getting into terrible condition, you see?

So, naturally, I was just trying to build this thing up to jar into her what her goal was. And then I gave her an old, moldy, decayed, dead body that had died of psoriasis. And boy, she put that on and that was much better. And she put on more and more and more of these and gradually she was up to a point where she was taking bodies that were merely dead. And then she was merely taking old bodies that were about to die. And all this with great rapidity, you understand. I mean, there wasn't any slowness about this, she was getting - communication line picking up - she was feeling better and better and better and better. In other words, by forcing her - pardon me - by giving her healthy bodies she was being forced at the wrong level of the scale. And by feeding her a gradient scale of bodies she could accept, she recovered from this illness. That's something for you to remember.

To give her something she could accept - it was right on the button was a certainty. What was it a certainty of? You see why it was the wrong end of the scale? She knew she couldn't accept, but she was being forced to accept a healthy body, so therefore, the mock-up, everything else, was insecure, uncertain. But to give her a body that was at her level of acceptance - this was great certainty. And so we merely had her certainly accepting bodies, which was what our goal was. Our goal was not to feed her decayed bodies, our goal was merely to get her to accept something she could accept and knew she could accept it, and therefore, on a gradient scale of certainty, bring her right back on up to the point where she could accept a healthy body.

A little bit of this processing is fantastic. This woman was ill and she left not ill on this process which I tell auditors, "Don't use this broadly on cases," mainly because it's not necessary to, but mostly because they just don't have the instruction, the indoctrination on the thing.

There comes a time, and there are some cases, where you run Acceptance Level Processing - they're bad enough off on acceptance - where they run Acceptance Level Processing and Expanded GITA simultaneously. Now, how do you do this?

You find the worst body you can possibly think of; in the worst condition, in the worst location, and they still can't accept it. Well now, you can run all the way on out the dynamics and run it by the dynamics or you can simply start in and shortcut it by running "wasting the last body you thought of." And if you had exhausted it down that far, they will probably be able to waste, in brackets, that body.

Such cases, fortunately, are not particularly numerous. They're - it's kind of rare. But the point is that any time you run Acceptance Level Processing and you just can't get bad enough on this case to get him to accept some kind of an item which he has to be able to accept - the only one you're really interested in is a body, right at this stage - is you run it all the way down scale as far as the condition of the item is concerned and then waste it. And that last one - wasting it in a bracket and then bringing it back up and accepting it - very, very well may turn the trick.

But the quickest shot in is Acceptance Level Processing. The longer process is Expanded GITA. You follow this? See, in other words, to do a fast job we do Acceptance Level Processing. And we just take a good shot at what this person has, and we guess - we guess this will do it, and we give them that, and then we run it down scale a little bit and generally they can accept it right along. But if they don't accept it with a little feeling of relief, if you don't really get that relief reaction from them as they accept it, you haven't gotten far enough down scale for - they're just being obedient. It takes your judgment as an auditor to know whether or not they're accepting this thing with certainty. That's the judgment.

What kind of a body will somebody accept who doesn't get out of his body easily? Well, that's for you to find out as an auditor. And you run it on Acceptance Level Processing.

All right. Let's take a pc that is in pretty good shape rather than someone who's in bad shape - there aren't any here really in bad shape.

LRH: All right. Now, let's put on a beautiful girl. Mock up a beautiful girl and put it on.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Another beautiful girl and put it on.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Another beautiful girl and put it on.

PC: Mm-hm. Each different or the same?

LRH: I don't care.

PC: Okay.

LRH: Oh, each was different.

PC: No, they tend to be the same.

LRH: Yeah. Well, do you find it very easy to accept this?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Very easy?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Good! See. All right. Another beautiful girl.

PC; Mm-hm.

LRH: A really gorgeous girl, now.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Oh, fabuious, with lots of training and manners and oh, stuff, you know? You know? Now one with terrific choreography ability.

PC: All right.

LRH: One with a beautiful singing voice.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: One who is rich.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: You notice all those talents? Put on this beautiful babe.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Is that better?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH.~ Put on this real good looking babe. Huh?

PC: Yes.

LRH: A nice-a nice babe, now.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: A very polite girl.

PC: No.

LRH: See? I was just doing that for - just to razzle-dazzle on the PC. There's an example of what acceptance is.

All right. Now get this completely uninhibited, utterly defensible woman.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Now get one who is very beautiful on top of all this.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Now get one who is very vicious.

PC: Mm.

LRH: A very beautiful, vicious woman.

PC: Mm.

LRH: A very beautiful girl who could get exactly what she wants.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: We hit it. How do you know we hit it?

All right. Let's take this beautiful girl who can get exactly what she wants, again.

PC: Yep.

LRH: Again.

PC: Mm-mm.

LRH: Again.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Again.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Let's mock up a lot of boxes of her; boxes full of her

PC: Mm-hm.

LIW: All right. Now keep taking them out of the box and putting them on.

PC: Mm.

LRH: What's the matter?

PC: By the dozens.

LRH: Dozens.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Good. Let's rig in some more boxes, have a whole bunch of freight trucks pull up outside and get people carrying those boxes of them upstairs - putting them on with fair rapidity. Let's have a warehouse of them down on the Delaware River, all of them beautifully animate. And get them, now, that are perfectly controlled by you.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: That better?

PC: Mm.hm. Mm.hm.

LRH: Get them now that can perfectly control others, too, but not you.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Don't like that so well?

PC: Mm, too tiresome.

LRH: Tiresome. Well, now get them that just love to be crushed.

PC: Mm.

LRH: That better? Whose emotions and impulses go out of control very easily.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Have to be watched very carefully. Hit it. Now let's get those, lots of them. Now get them with very beautiful eyes, particularly lovely eyes. All-seeing eyes, now, that can look straight through people, but are very beautiful.

PC: Mm. No.

LRH: Eyes that people are afraid of.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Eyes that pull people in.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Eyes that are very daring.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Just simply beautiful eyes. All right. Get a girl now who has eyes and really can use them.

PC: Mm.

LRH: And has no inhibition whatsoever about doing so.

PC: Mm.

LRH: What have we hit? Go on. Another beautiful girl.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Another one.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Another one. Another one. A very relaxed, feline girl now; very nice, beautifully dressed.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Daringly dressed.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Nakedly dressed.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: More of them.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Get lots of them.

PC: Mm.

LRH: One that can't be embarrassed.

PC: Mm.

LRH: More of them. More of them. Why don't you just cram all these down in a space where you are.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Cram them down real good.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Real tight. Okay. Now get a flock of them for the future. Enormous number of them for the future.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Now get babies that will grow into them in the future.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Enormous numbers of these.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Get those all racked up properly so they're available at any moment.

PC: They're almost so available they might begin to get boring sometime.

LRH: They're so terrifically available?

PC: They're beginning to get a little bit that way.

LRH: Is that right?

PC: Mm.

LRH: Well, let's get...

PC: Not quite.

LRH: ... about twice as many.

PC: All right.

LRH: Now let's have them perfectly preserved. Now let's have an entire - a tremendous system of completely reliable preservation for these bodies, so there's just no slightest chance that you would ever miss getting one of them anytime you wanted one.

PC: Mm. Yeah.

LRH: Got it?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Real good system. Now just hide that whole setup so it's only you know where it is.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: All right. Now let's mock up a bunch of babies that will grow into such beautiful women in the future.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Got that?

PC: Acres of them.

LRH: Acres of them?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: And now have them - have beautiful women, too, so you wouldn't have to even go through the trials of being a baby to become one.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Got that?

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Got that? Well, put some protection around these.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Now on each one make sure that you paint the sign - of your own sign, insignia - as your property.

PC: Yeah. Yeah.

LRH: Got that?

PC: Yes.

LRH: All right. Put a big sign over the gate about "sole proprietor."

PC: Yeah.

LRII: Okay. Well, let's be about ten feet back of your head.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Better ease on it?

PC: I like "Over" better than "in back."

LRH: All right. Be a thousand feet up, then.

PC: Oh no. Don't rush to extremes!

LRH: Okay.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Be above.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Now exteriorizing a little more easily?

PC: Mm.

LRH: Mm? Now, what would you lack to exteriorize much better?

PC: Mm.

LRH: What do you think you might have?

PC: Perception.

LRH: You might have some perception. What kind of perception do you want?

PC: Visual mostly.

LRH: Mm?

PC: Visual is what I lack the most.

LRH: Visual, huh?

PC: The Seeing Eye dog is a little nearsighted.

LRH: Good. Well, let's take this visual idea now and let's find out what kind of looking you can have.

PC: Well, fuzzy, to begin with.

LRH: Well, let's take very fuzzy looking.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Good. Fuzzy and blurry.

PC: Yes.

LRH: And a limited number of objects.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Fuzzy, blurred. Now mock that up, mock up that kind of looking.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: And get yourself accepting it.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: And let's get - accepting some more of it.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Let's get it foggy, fuzzy and blurred. Got that?

PC: Yes.

LRH: Let's get some more of them.

PC: Yes.

LRH: Now let's get a very limited number of objects that you can discern.

PC: Yes. LRH: Let's mock up accepting it some more. Let's get lots of it.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Okay. Let's take a look around now. Is that a little better or a little worse?

PC: Mm.

LRH: A little worse?

PC: A little better.

LRH: A little better?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: All right. Let's get the kind of looking you would get through cataracts - through eye cataracts. Mm?

PC: That's kind of blotchy and gloomy.

LRH: You don't like that so good. You could have that.

All right. Now, let's kind of get the kind of looking you'd get through great thick spectacles.

PC: That's too clear.

LRH: That's too clear? Well, get thick spectacles that have been stained almost black.

PC: No.

LRH: Well, how about mud splashed on them?

PC: No.

LRH: No. What kind of looking would you say it was?

PC: Just a little vague and distorted.

LRH: All right. Let's get distorted - distorted-vision lenses in these so they distort the vision. You know, blur the vision?

PC: Yeah.

LRH: All right. Now let's accept a lot of those.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Easy to do?

PC: I'm not enthusiastic about it...

LRH: Let's get other people accepting them, too. Just start throwing those things out into space and find out who they are acceptable to.

PC: I see quite a lot of people that are very curious to look through them.

LRH: Oh, is this what's wrong with them? Yeah.

PC: They're like looking at a crazy house mirror or something.

LRH: Oh, I see. Well, get gauze to look through.

PC: Gauze?

LRH: Mm-hm, gauze.

PC: Mm.

LRH: Lots more gauze to look through.

PC: No.

LRH: You don't like that? What do you like, then?

PC: Just sort of musty vision, you know, sort of a - through a rain or a little foggy or...

LRH: Good. Good.

PC: ... something like that.

LRH: Let's get it through a hard rain.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Get lots of vision through a hard rain now.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: More vision.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: More vision now. More vision now. Now let the rain let up somewhat.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: Now let it let up somewhat again.

PC: Mm-mm.

LRH: Okay. Now get what would happen to you, where you are there, if you suddenly did take a look.